2024 Q3 AML Regulatory Inspection Focus Update
Insights for Chinese Money Remitters
Lan’s Enterprise Limited Training Program
Training Objectives
What You’ll Learn Today
- Ensure alignment between business practice and AML programme documentation
- Understand Chinese remittance characteristics and address regulatory misunderstandings
- Implement enhanced record keeping with proper time stamps and file notes
- Apply a holistic approach to Enhanced Customer Due Diligence (ECDD)
- Prepare effectively for upcoming regulatory inspections
Overview
Regulatory Inspection Context
Several business partners are currently undergoing regulatory onsite visits. This training provides critical insights from recent inspections to help all BPs prepare effectively.
Focus Area
Analysis of AML regulatory inspections specifically for Chinese money remitters, addressing common compliance issues and regulatory expectations.
Observation 1: Alignment Between Business Practice and AML Programme
The Compliance Challenge
Your AML Programme must reflect your actual business practices. Any gaps between documentation and reality will be identified as non-compliant.
Example 1: Director Approval
Legal Requirement
Your AML Programme stipulates that it must be approved by your director—this is a legal requirement.
What Regulators Expect
- Email confirmation from director
- Meeting minutes documenting approval
- Board resolution
If you cannot produce these records = FAIL
Example 2: Face-to-Face Meetings
Voluntary Practice
Your AML Programme may specify that you conduct face-to-face meetings with all new customers (by choice).
What Regulators Expect
- File notes of meetings
- Documentation of meeting outcomes
- Evidence of consistent practice
No records = Non-compliant = FAIL
Conclusion: Documentation is Critical
Best Practice
For Legal Requirements:
- Maintain formal records
- Ensure readily accessible
- Document approvals properly
For Voluntary Practices:
- Establish internal record-keeping procedures
- Document consistently
- Make available for regulatory review
Observation 2: Chinese Remittance Characteristics
The Challenge
Chinese money remitters operate in a complex environment—providing legitimate and essential services while navigating Chinese currency control policies.
The Opportunity
Adopt a transparent and proactive approach with Regulators by educating them on Chinese practices and cultural nuances.
Issue 1: Multiple Bank Accounts and Split Payments
Why This Matters
Regulators often perceive multiple bank accounts and splitting payments as potential risk.
Root Causes
- Chinese currency control policies: Annual limit of USD $50,000 per person
- Daily transfer limits: Imposed by Chinese banks as anti-fraud measures to protect customers
Understanding Chinese Banking Regulations
Not Preference—Necessity
Multiple bank accounts are required due to:
- Anti-fraud initiatives
- Daily transaction limits
- Protection of individual assets
Our Compliance
We maintain:
- Strict identity verification
- Source of funds/wealth verification
- Comprehensive records of all fund flows
Document this clearly in your Risk Assessment
Issue 2: Mingled Funds
Service Company Transfers
Regulators are concerned when BPs use SG/HK intermediate remitters to send customer funds to CFX for settlement.
Our Transparent Process
- Bulk transfers via licensed money remitter
- One-to-one matching with customer orders
- Meticulous tracking: Customer → Service Companies (CNY) → CFX (USD/HKD)
- All transactions recorded and traceable
Profit Credit Usage
The Practice
Using BP profit credits on CFX platform to settle customer transactions is cost-effective and commercial.
The Transparency
- Profit credits in multiple currencies
- Every transaction documented
- Profit withdrawals recorded
- Use of credits for payments tracked
This ensures transparency and mitigates AML/CFT risks
Issue 3: Offsetting Method
Documentation Requirement
The offsetting method is documented in CFX’s annual Audit Questionnaire.
Action Required
Ensure you explicitly incorporate the offsetting method into your Risk Assessment.
Issue 4: Incomplete Bank Account Numbers
The Concern
Regulators worry that incomplete bank details hinder account verification.
The Reality
This is due to strict information protection and privacy regulations in Chinese banking, not oversight.
Legal Avenues to Obtain Full Details
- Via court order
- Through notary public
- Via lawyer obtaining investigation order
All require probable cause—account ownership verification does not qualify
Verifying Account Ownership
Despite Privacy Protections
- Account ownership can still be ascertained
- Doesn’t hinder PTR and SAR reporting obligations
- Redacted details maintain privacy while enabling compliance
Your Action
Document clearly in your AML Programme how you verify bank account ownership under these circumstances.
Issue 5: WeChat Communication Concerns
The Regulatory Concern
Use of WeChat nicknames/aliases may hinder ability to reconstruct customer activities.
The Reality of WeChat
- 1.3 billion users worldwide
- Comprehensive payment solution
- Integral tool for daily life in China
WeChat Identity Verification
Rigorous Standards
- Phone number for registration
- Government-issued ID for authentication
- Bank card registered to user
- Two-contact verification for device switching
WeChat’s identity verification standards surpass those in our AML/CFT Act
Immutable Identity
Users can change nicknames, but WeChat ID remains consistent and immutable.
WeChat Best Practice
Current Practice
Every transaction is meticulously documented in:
- CFX’s platform
- BPs’ CRM systems
Recommended Enhancement
- Use WeChat for preliminary communication
- Finalize all agreements via email
- Save emails in customer file
- WeChat serves as supplementary information
- Email acts as formal and binding record
Observation 3: Enhanced Record Keeping
Increased Scrutiny
Regulators focus not only on whether records are maintained, but also on their quality.
Record Keeping Requirements
Time Stamps
- Date of customer onboarding
- Date of each transaction
- When identity verification conducted
- When screening performed
Bank Account Details
- Accurate CNY bank account details
- Payment confirmations
- Proof account held by customer
File Notes and Decision-Making
File Notes Must Document
- Customer’s purpose for transactions
- Source of funds/wealth (SOF/SOW)
- Transaction behavior
- Indications of suspicious activity
Decision-Making Process
- Filing of Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)
- Account termination decisions
- Decision NOT to file a SAR
High-Net-Worth Customer Profile
Recommendation
Use the “High-Net-Worth Customer Profile” template for customers who have provided SOF/SOW evidence.
Benefits
- Helps Regulators draw informed conclusions
- Clarifies customer’s financial standing
- Explains transaction purpose
- Addresses complexity of SOF/SOW documents
Clear, detailed notes facilitate Regulator understanding
Observation 4: Holistic Approach to ECDD
Heightened Standards
Regulators have raised the bar for verifying customers’ Source of Funds and Source of Wealth.
What No Longer Suffices
A bank statement showing significant balance but no regular income is no longer adequate evidence.
Gifts from Parents
Cultural Context
In Chinese culture, parents commonly gift money to children, especially for property purchases—this was highlighted at last year’s FIU conference.
Required Documentation
- Familial relationship evidence: Household register or notarized kinship documents
- Parents’ identity verification
- Parents’ SOF/SOW verification through reliable documentation
- Detailed file notes when formal gifting certificate unavailable
Third-Party Gifts
Enhanced Scrutiny
Funds received as gifts from parents or third parties are subject to increased scrutiny.
Documentation Requirements
- Verify relationship between donor and recipient
- Verify donor’s identity
- Verify donor’s SOF/SOW
- Document gift circumstances
Loans
- Formal loan agreement (Regulators actively review these)
- Bank records showing fund transfer from lender to recipient
- Lender’s identity verification
- Lender’s SOF/SOW verification
Why This Matters
The lender’s funds represent the ultimate source being utilized by the customer—understanding their origin is critical for assessing ML/TF risks.
Complex Funding Scenarios
Example: Company Shareholder Capital Injection
When a shareholder injects capital sourced from a third party (e.g., father-in-law):
Required Documentation
- Clear chain of evidence
- Trace flow of funds
- Establish transparency
- Ensure compliance
The importance of establishing a comprehensive evidentiary trail cannot be overstated
Key Takeaways
1. Alignment is Critical
- Document what you do, do what you document
- Maintain formal records for legal requirements
- Establish procedures for voluntary practices
2. Educate Regulators Proactively
- Explain Chinese banking realities in your RA
- Provide cultural context
- Document processes transparently
Key Takeaways (Continued)
3. Quality Record Keeping
- Include time stamps on all records
- Document decision-making processes
- Maintain comprehensive file notes
- Use customer profile templates
4. Holistic ECDD
- Verify ultimate source of funds
- Document third-party relationships
- Obtain formal agreements for loans
- Establish clear evidentiary chains
- AML Compliance Team: aml@gmfinance.co.nz
- Emergency Hotline: +64 09-309-8808
- Training Program: Lan’s Enterprise Limited
Questions?
Feel free to call for any queries regarding regulatory inspection preparation.
Thank You
Stay Vigilant, Stay Compliant